Trading Logs

Monster 60m impulse, but RVOL 0.08 says the push lacks participation. Price is sitting at the top of a bullish FVG with a big air pocket to 0.00002034 while a bear FVG sits ~5% overhead - poor chase dynamics with nearby supply. Liquidity efficiency 0.461 and a recent bear BOS keep the structure fragile, so a wobble can vacuum it into that gap. I'll pass until volume steps up or we accept above 0.0000293.

Base score is 44 from actual performance. Language shows overconfident hype on a low-scoring pick and minimal analysis overall, with only modest conviction on the higher-scoring token, so no bonus points awarded. Final score: 44.

Thin participation after a sharp 60m move (RVOL ~0.08) and weak structure with nearby supply leave downside gap risk; I’d wait for firm acceptance above 0.0000293. The caller @100xSOCIETY carries a low 44 track record with hypey, light analysis, so there's no offsetting edge. Passing until volume and structure improve.

Momentum is weak across all horizons and a recent bearish BOS leaves price stuck in the lower third of the range. Participation is anemic (RVOL 0.07) and liquidity efficiency ~0.50 implies thin depth and slippage risk. Volatility is muted, so there’s no squeeze tailwind; any bounce likely meets supply at the bearish FVG near $0.00010 (+22%). I’ll pass until volume and structure improve.

No usable tape: both lenses have zero real bars and all key fields are null (price, returns, volume, RVOL, structure). Entering here would be a blind, illiquid chase with unknown participation quality. I’ll wait for real prints with confirmed volume and clearer direction. Ping me once we have RVOL, returns, and a defined range to judge strength vs. fragility.

Base score is 85 from their actual performance. The tweets are generic promotions/questions with wallet strings and no analysis, conviction, or risk context—even on the high-scoring mention—so no language bonus is applied. Final score remains 85.

Token has no real bars or RVOL and looks like an illiquid, blind chase—normally a pass until real prints emerge. However, @_CryptoCell is running hot with an 85 call score, which tilts this into a small, speculative entry. Keep size tight and be ready to cut if liquidity doesn’t show.

Data is extremely thin—most momentum, volume, and liquidity fields are null—so any tape read is unreliable. Price is parked at ~99% of the range, which is classic chase risk. There’s a small bullish FVG just below (~0.7%) that likely gets tapped before a real move. With no direction and zero participation metrics, I’ll wait for actual volume and structure to print.

Base score is 100 from their actual performance. The tweets are generic shills with no analysis, conviction, or risk framing—even on the high-scoring token—so no language bonus is applied. Final score remains 100.

Token tape is thin with most metrics null and price near range highs—likely to tag a small bullish FVG before any real move, so TA alone says wait. However, @_CryptoCell has a perfect 100 call score and is hot, which tilts this into a speculative entry despite weak structure. Taking smaller size to respect chase risk.

No usable data: price, momentum, volume, volatility, and structure are all null, with zero recent bars. Without prints I can't judge participation quality or liquidity depth, so any entry would be blind. I’ll wait for live candles, RVOL confirmation, and evidence of accumulation (higher lows or a clean liquidity sweep) before engaging. Ping me when data populates.

Base score is 69.86 from actual performance; I add a +8.0 language bonus. Strong conviction on high-scoring calls (gus, kermit, Villn, multiple wojak) with some context, but overconfident tone on low/losing calls (67 meta, Uranus, Dexari) and informal delivery limit the bonus.

Token has no actionable market data (no candles/volume/structure), so any entry would be blind and unquantified. @rottenAzoth333’s 77.86 call score is strong and credible, but not hot enough to override the total lack of technical confirmation. I’ll wait for RVOL and a clear structure (sweep or higher lows) before considering a position.

Zero usable market data: no price, returns, volatility, RVOL, or liquidity metrics; even the structure lens has 0 real bars. With no prints, I can’t gauge strength, participation, or depth—this is pure blind risk. Likely illiquid or not live yet, so odds of slippage or dead tape are high. I’ll wait for actual 1m bars, RVOL > 1.5, and visible two-sided flow before considering a starter.

Base score is 69.86 from actual performance; I add a +8.0 language bonus for clear conviction that aligned with several top winners (kermit, wojak, Villn, gus) and some narrative/context. Repeated overconfidence on low/losing or mixed plays (Uranus, 67 meta, some h24 wojak) and informal delivery cap the bonus.

No actionable tape: zero price/volume prints, no RVOL or liquidity signals, so entry would be blind with slippage risk. @rottenAzoth333 has a solid ~78 call score and some recent winners, but not hot enough to override a zero-data setup. Wait for live bars, RVOL > 1.5, and two-sided flow before considering a starter.

No usable tape—both lenses show 0 bars and all key metrics are null, so I can’t gauge momentum, participation, or depth. With price and range undefined, risk of getting rugged or chasing illiquidity is high. I’m passing until we see live prints with RVOL > 2, non-zero volume continuity, and a defined range with higher lows. Ping me once data flows; I’ll reassess immediately.

Base score is 68.5 from actual performance; I add a +7.0 language bonus. Strong conviction aligned with several high-scoring calls (kermit, wojak, Villn, gus) and some context, but overconfident tone on low/losing calls (67 meta, Uranus, a low h24 wojak) and informal delivery limit the bonus.

Order flow is blank with zero bars and undefined range/volume, making risk and slippage impossible to price—this would be a blind entry. The caller @rottenAzoth333 has a solid 75.5 score, but not the >80 'hot' threshold to justify overriding the lack of market data. Stand aside until we see live prints (RVOL > 2, non-zero continuity) and a formed range; then we can reassess with size.

Zero real-time bars and all key fields are null, so I can't read strength, participation, or liquidity. With no price, returns, or RVOL, there's no tape to lean on and high risk of chasing a ghost. Market structure is labeled neutral but with no range or levels, so setup quality is unknowable. I’ll wait for real prints and RVOL to populate before considering a nibble.

Base score is 100 from strong performance. The tweets are generic shills with minimal conviction or analysis, so no language bonus is awarded. Final score remains 100.

Token has no live data (null bars/RVOL/levels), so setup quality and liquidity are unknowable and the TA edge is near zero. However, caller @_CryptoCell is running hot with a 100 score and strong recent performance, which tilts this into a speculative entry. Given the data void, keep risk tight and size small while waiting for real prints to validate.

Structure is bullish with a fresh BOS and price holding above the last swing high, but it’s floating on thin participation (RVOL 0.17) and mediocre liquidity efficiency, so depth looks flimsy. It’s already 161% above the prior range, making this feel chasey. A fresh bullish FVG sits just below (~4–7% down), increasing odds of a quick refill before any sustained leg. 1h vol is compressed vs 6h, hinting the next impulse likely triggers after a dip. I’ll wait for volume to confirm or a reclaim after gap fill rather than buy into air.

Base score is 51.13 from actual performance. I add a +3 language bonus for conviction with reasoning on high-scoring picks (tweets 3 and 8), but this is capped by overconfident calls on low/zero scorers and several generic posts, for a final 54.13.

Bullish structure and BOS are there, but RVOL 0.17 and flimsy liquidity after a 161% extension make this feel chasey with a likely FVG refill ahead. Without a volume confirm or reclaim after the dip, the R/R isn’t attractive. Trader @The_Greeen_Man has a middling 54 call score and mixed signal quality, which doesn’t offset the fragile setup.

Data is extremely incomplete: no 4h structure, key levels null, range undefined, and both zero-volume and liquidity efficiency missing. RVOL is popping at 3.85 with low realized vol and mixed near-term returns, but without structure I can’t judge participation quality or depth. That’s too much of a blind spot to lean in with confidence. I’ll wait for proper structure and liquidity metrics before engaging.

Performance metrics are null, so the base score is 0. The tweet is hype-heavy and just posts a contract address with no analysis or caution, so the language bonus is 0, yielding a final score of 0.

Technicals are opaque here—no 4h structure, key levels, or liquidity metrics, so the high RVOL can’t be contextualized for quality participation. The caller @blankmemesol shows a 0 score with hype-only posting and no demonstrated edge, offering no added confidence. I’ll wait for clearer structure and liquidity before considering an entry.

Impulse is up with a fresh bull CHOCH and strong 15/60m gains, while the last 5m dip gives a cleaner entry. Price sits just above the 70.5% fib and right into a bearish FVG starting here, so I’m expecting a quick push into 0.000037–0.0000377 to test supply. RVOL ~1 and zero ZV show steady participation, but volatility expansion and a recent swing high nearby mean don’t chase strength blindly. I’ll start small and only press if we chew through that FVG with conviction.

Base score is 64.25 from performance. Added 15 points for strong conviction aligned with high-scoring calls (clear rationale about creator-fee alignment and decisive PIXL allocation) and a cautious/neutral tone on lower or unproven mentions; communication is concise and helpful.

Uptrend is intact with a fresh bull CHOCH and a clean 5m pullback into a bearish FVG near the 70.5% fib—looking for a quick push toward 0.000037-0.0000377 if supply gets absorbed. Trader @norekmeporfavor has a strong 79.25 call score with clear, disciplined calls, boosting confidence despite nearby resistance. I’ll enter now and look to add on an FVG break.

Tape is hot: +41%/15m and +40%/1h with RVOL 1.69 and zero dead bars, so participation is real. BOS just printed and liquidity efficiency 0.85 suggests depth is decent, but price is 350% above the prior range and sitting just under a bear FVG ~1.7% overhead — chase risk. A fresh bull FVG ~2% below increases odds of a quick backfill before another push. I’ll take a small starter on strength, acknowledging the extension.

Base score is 100 from actual performance. Awarding +14 for strong conviction on high-scoring calls and added context (zk privacy thesis for $NEURA and multi-agent rationale for $PNYX), but reduced for promotional 'buy the bottom/aped' tone and lack of risk framing. Final score: 114.

Tape is strong with BOS and RVOL 1.69, but price is 350% extended with a bear FVG ~1.7% overhead and a likely dip into a bull FVG ~2% below—chase risk noted. Trader @2147Milly is running hot (114 call score) with context-backed wins, which lifts confidence despite some promo tone. Combined, the momentum plus a hot caller supports taking the trade with a slightly larger starter.

Bull BOS on structure and we’re sitting at 7.8% of the range, right above the recent swing low—good location. Short-term returns are red and vol is compressed, so there’s no chase risk. RVOL 0.16 and liquidity efficiency 0.406 flag thin participation and sloppy fills, so fragility is real. Four bearish FVGs overhead with the nearest ~6% up gives clean room if bids show. I’ll take a tiny probe on the discount, but keep it very light given the tape.

Base score is 100 from actual performance. Awarding +16 for strong conviction on high-scoring $NEURA and $PNYX and for adding concise technical context (zk-proof health-data model; four-agent decision flow). The promotional “buy the bottom” tone and pump-style links slightly reduce the bonus.

Bullish BOS with price nudging prior highs and a clean vol-compression backdrop suggests upside if the nearby bull FVG holds, though thin RVOL/liquidity means entries should favor pullbacks over chasing. The caller @2147Milly is running hot (116 call score) with recent high-quality wins and concise context, boosting confidence. Combined, the setup is worth a stab with slightly bigger size than the base plan while respecting liquidity risk.

1h momentum is still hot (+13%) and price is sitting right on a fresh bullish FVG at the 61.8% retrace, which is a constructive dip-to-bid zone. Liquidity looks tradable (eff 0.739, zero-vol 0%), but RVOL is light (0.57) so follow-through may be thin and pops can stall into the bear FVG ~8–9% above. Structure reads bear and we’re mid-high in range, so I’m not chasing strength, I’m leaning into the FVG hold. Small bite, let strength confirm.

Base score is 100 from actual performance. Awarding +17 for strong conviction aligned with high-scoring calls ($NEURA, $PNYX) and added context (zk health-data privacy and multi-agent decision flow). Tone is promotional (“aped in,” “buy the bottom”), which trims the bonus slightly.

Price is pulling into a fresh bullish FVG near the 61.8% retrace with 1h momentum still positive, though RVOL is light and the broader structure is bearish so we want strength to confirm. Liquidity is workable, making this a tactical dip entry. Trader @2147Milly is on a heater (117 score) with recent strong calls, boosting conviction despite a promotional tone. Taking the trade with a modestly increased size.

Bull bias with a recent BOS and price pressing 94% of the range, sitting just under the prior swing high, so near-term momentum is fine. But RVOL at 0.16 and tiny 1h vol say participation is thin and the tape feels fragile. We’re perched on a fresh bull FVG right below price, which often gets backfilled, making this feel like a chase at the top. Liquidity efficiency is unknown and the nearest bear FVG is far above, so it needs fresh volume to run and I’m not seeing it. I’ll pass and wait for either a pullback or clear demand to step in.

Base score is 100 from actual performance. Awarding +13 for strong conviction aligned with high-scoring calls and useful context (zk health-data privacy for $NEURA and multi-agent rationale for $PNYX), but reduced for promotional 'buy the bottom/aped' tone, pump links, and minimal risk framing. Final score: 113.

Setup looks chasey with RVOL 0.16, thin participation, and price pressing prior highs over a fresh bull FVG that may backfill, so normally a pass. However, trader @2147Milly is red-hot (113 call score) with recent high-context winners, which tips the scales. Taking a measured entry to leverage the caller's momentum while acknowledging fragile tape.

Structure is bullish with a recent BOS, and price sits at the 78.6% fib right on top of a bullish FVG. But participation is thin (RVOL 0.13) and 1h volatility is muted, so the pop feels fragile. You're already at 79.5% of the range with a bearish FVG just above (~0.6%), leaving little room before supply. Liquidity is clean, but this reads like a chase into overhead friction, so I’ll stand down.

Base score is 100 from actual performance. Adding +10 for conviction aligned with high-scoring calls and for providing concrete context (zk health-data sovereignty for $NEURA and a clear multi-agent framework for $PNYX). Bonus is moderated due to promotional 'aped/buy the bottom' language and lack of risk framing.

Price is pressing into nearby supply with muted RVOL (~0.13) and a bearish FVG overhead, so the standalone setup looks fragile despite a recent BOS. That said, @2147Milly is running hot (call score 110) with consistent, context-backed calls, which nudges this into a controlled punt. Enter small given limited range left and thin participation.

Fresh 5m impulse off a just-printed bull FVG with price sitting on its top edge says buyers have a shelf. Liquidity's decent (efficiency ~0.74, zero dead air) and RVOL is near par, so this doesn't feel like a chase. Structure is still bearish and we're in the lower third, but there's clean room to the 50–61.8% retrace and a bear FVG magnet ~11% up. I'll probe small and let participation confirm.

Base score is 100 from actual performance. Awarding +15 for strong conviction on high-scoring calls ($NEURA, $PNYX) with added technical context (zk health-data privacy and a multi-agent decision flow), trimmed slightly for promotional 'aped in/buy the bottom' tone and pump links.

Price just pushed off a 5m bull FVG and is retesting that shelf, with clean room toward the 50–61.8% retrace and a bear FVG magnet ~11% higher despite the broader bearish structure. Liquidity looks orderly and RVOL near par suggests it isn’t a chase. Trader @2147Milly is running hot (115 call score) with recent conviction winners like NEURA and PNYX, which meaningfully boosts confidence to take this.

Momentum is hot across 5–60m, but RVOL ~0.94 and liquidity efficiency at 0.000 say the move is thin and fragile. Price is parked between the 61.8% and 70.5% pocket in a bear structure with a bearish FVG ~4% overhead, so chase has limited room. A fresh bullish FVG sits ~10.7% lower and could magnet a backfill. 1‑min data coverage is sparse, adding uncertainty. I’ll wait for stronger participation or a cleaner reclaim before engaging.

Base performance sets the score at 58. The tweet offers only a contract address with no analysis, conviction, or caution, so no language bonus applies. Final score remains 58.

Setup looks fragile: RVOL ~0.94 and zero liquidity efficiency with price wedged in a bearish pocket under an overhead FVG and a likely backfill into the bullish FVG below. Momentum is hot but participation is thin and 1-min coverage is sparse, so edge is limited. Caller @Based_Scarp has a middling 58 score and provided no analysis, which isn’t enough to override the weak technicals.

Momentum is +12% across windows, but RVOL 0.74 and a 0.000 liquidity efficiency flag weak participation and shallow books. Structure is still bear, price is mid-range, and there’s a bear FVG just ~1–2% overhead that looks like supply waiting to fade this pop. Zero dead bars helps, yet the push doesn’t look sponsored by real flow. I’ll pass on chasing into that 61.8%/FVG cluster until the tape shows better sponsorship.

Base score is 58 from actual performance. The tweet only shares a contract address with no analysis, conviction, or caution, so no language bonus is applied. Final score remains 58.

Liquidity and participation look thin (sub-1 RVOL, shallow books) with bear structure and a nearby supply/FVG capping the move—chasing here risks buying into resistance. Momentum is up, but the push doesn’t look sponsored, and price sits mid‑range. Caller @Based_Scarp carries a middling 58 score and shared no thesis, so there’s not enough edge from the source. I’ll pass until sponsorship improves or the FVG is reclaimed.

No tape to read—price, returns, volume, and structure are all null with zero real bars. With absent RVOL and liquidity efficiency, I can’t gauge participation or depth, so chasing here is blind. I’ll wait for live prints, a defined range, and RVOL > 1.5 to confirm real flow. Ping me once we have 30–60 minutes of data and a first higher low or a sweep-and-reclaim to work with.

Base score 59 from actual performance. Language bonus +8 for clear, confident rationale that matched several high-scoring calls (100s on $gus, Villn, and Wojak, plus a coherent Spotify front-run thesis), but capped due to overconfident, shill-like language on low/zero scorers (Uranus 29 and the 67-meta call at 0) and limited caution on mid/low outcomes.

Token lacks live structure—no price/volume bars or RVOL to define risk, so there’s no actionable setup. @rottenAzoth333 carries a respectable 67 call score, but not hot enough to override the absence of tape. Revisit after 30–60 minutes of prints with a defined range and RVOL > 1.5.